# Fines for providers of general-purpose AI models — AI Act — context bundle > Focused context for a single provision, curated from overview.legal on 2026-08-22. Canonical page: https://overview.legal/laws/ai-act/art-101 > Every item cites its source. Verify against the official text (EUR-Lex / wetten.overheid.nl) before relying on it. ## Provision ### Fines for providers of general-purpose AI models — Fines for providers of general-purpose AI models *AI Act, aiact-art-101-en — https://overview.legal/laws/ai-act/art-101* 1. The Commission may impose on providers of general-purpose AI models fines not exceeding 3 % of their annual total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year or EUR 15 000 000, whichever is higher., when the Commission finds that the provider intentionally or negligently: a) infringed the relevant provisions of this Regulation; b) failed to comply with a request for a document or for information pursuant to Article 91, or supplied incorrect, incomplete or misleading information; c) failed to comply with a measure requested under Article 93; d) failed to make available to the Commission access to the general-purpose AI model or general-purpose AI model with systemic risk with a view to conducting an evaluation pursuant to Article 92. - In fixing the amount of the fine or periodic penalty payment, regard shall be had to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness. The Commission shall also into account commitments made in accordance with Article 93(3) or made in relevant codes of practice in accordance with Article 56. 2. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of the general-purpose AI model and give it an opportunity to be heard. 3. Fines imposed in accordance with this Article shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 4. Information on fines imposed under this Article shall also be communicated to the Board as appropriate. 5. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions of the Commission fixing a fine under this Article. It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed. 6. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts containing detailed arrangements and procedural safeguards for proceedings in view of the possible adoption of decisions pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2). ## Guidance ### EDPB Annual Report 2025 *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/125683* Clarity in action: Supporting stakeholders through guidance and dialogue Annual Report 2025 Foreword 3 Highlights 4 1. The EDPB Secretariat 6 1.1 Mission And Activities 8 2. European Data Protection Board – Activities in 2025 12 2.1 Bridging Fundamental Rights and Digital Innovation Through GDPR Compliance 12 2.1.1 Helsinki high-level meeting: enhanced clarity, support and engagement 12 2.1.2 Regulation on procedural rules and Omnibus regulation on the record of processing 14 2.1.3 Cross… ### Report on stakeholder event on processing of personal data to target or deliver political advertisements *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/125684* Report on stakeholder event on processing of personal data to target or deliver political advertisements 27 March 2026 1. Background The EDPB organised an online stakeholder event on 27 March 2026 to collect stakeholders’ input on processing of personal data to target or deliver political advertisements. The objective was to engage with stakeholders at an early stage of drafting the EDPB Guidelines on the processing of personal data to target or deliver political advertisements (Chapter III of… ### Report on stakeholder event on anonymisation and pseudonymisation of 12 December 2025 *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/125688* Report on stakeholder event on anonymisation and pseudonymisation of 12 December 2025 1. Background The EDPB organise d a remote stakeholder event on 12 December 2025 to collect stakeholders’ input on anonymisation and pseudonymisation , following the Court of Justice of the European Union ( “ CJEU ” ) judgment in case EDPS v SRB 1 . The objective was to engage with stakeholders to inform the EDPB’s ongoing work on its guidelines 01/2025 on pseudonymisation and f orthcoming guidelines on… ### EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 1/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/53738* EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 1/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) ### Vormvoorstel Nederlandse regulatory sandbox *Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens — https://overview.legal/posts/50722* De aankomende AI-verordening verplicht lidstaten tot het oprichten van ten minste één AI regulatory sandbox vanaf augustus 2026. Binnen een regulatory sandbox bieden toezichthouders ondersteuning aan aanbieders van AI-systemen die tijdens de ontwikkeling vragen hebben over hoe zij aan de AI-veror... ## Related topics - **AI Value Chain Actors and Roles** — https://overview.legal/topics/ai-value-chain-actors ## Legal Framework - **GPAI Systemic Risk** — https://overview.legal/topics/general-purpose-ai-models-systemic-risk ## Legal Framework --- Generated by overview.legal · https://overview.legal/laws/ai-act/art-101 · 2026-08-22