# Human oversight — AI Act — context bundle

> Focused context for a single provision, curated from overview.legal on 2026-08-22. Canonical page: https://overview.legal/laws/ai-act/art-14
> Every item cites its source. Verify against the official text (EUR-Lex / wetten.overheid.nl) before relying on it.

## Provision

### Human oversight — Human oversight

*AI Act, aiact-art-14-en — https://overview.legal/laws/ai-act/art-14*

1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way, including with appropriate human-machine interface tools, that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which they are in use.

2. Human oversight shall aim to prevent or minimise the risks to health, safety or fundamental rights that may emerge when a high-risk AI system is used in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse, in particular where such risks persist despite the application of other requirements set out in this Section.

3. The oversight measures shall be commensurate with the risks, level of autonomy and context of use of the high-risk AI system, and shall be ensured through either one or both of the following types of measures:
   a) measures identified and built, when technically feasible, into the high-risk AI system by the provider before it is placed on the market or put into service;
   b) measures identified by the provider before placing the high-risk AI system on the market or putting it into service and that are appropriate to be implemented by the deployer.

4. For the purpose of implementing paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, the high-risk AI system shall be provided to the deployer in such a way that natural persons to whom human oversight is assigned are enabled, as appropriate and proportionate:
   a) to properly understand the relevant capacities and limitations of the high-risk AI system and be able to duly monitor its operation, including in view of detecting and addressing anomalies, dysfunctions and unexpected performance;
   b) to remain aware of the possible tendency of automatically relying or over-relying on the output produced by a high-risk AI system (automation bias), in particular for high-risk AI systems used to provide information or recommendations for decisions to be taken by natural persons;
   c) to correctly interpret the high-risk AI system’s output, taking into account, for example, the interpretation tools and methods available;
   d) to decide, in any particular situation, not to use the high-risk AI system or to otherwise disregard, override or reverse the output of the high-risk AI system;
   e) to intervene in the operation of the high-risk AI system or interrupt the system through a ‘stop’ button or a similar procedure that allows the system to come to a halt in a safe state.

5. For high-risk AI systems referred to in point 1(a) of Annex III, the measures referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article shall be such as to ensure that, in addition, no action or decision is taken by the deployer on the basis of the identification resulting from the system unless that identification has been separately verified and confirmed by at least two natural persons with the necessary competence, training and authority.
   - The requirement for a separate verification by at least two natural persons shall not apply to high-risk AI systems used for the purposes of law enforcement, migration, border control or asylum, where Union or national law considers the application of this requirement to be disproportionate.

## Guidance

### AI: complex algorithms and effective data protection supervision

*EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/50409*

EDPB/SPE 23 jan 2025 AI: complex algorithms and effective data protection supervision. Een rapport opgesteld door Kris Shrishak (ICCL/Enforce) waarin met name bias assessment en rechten van betrokkenen in de AI context geïmplementeerd kunnen worden.

### Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement

*EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/38075*

More  and  more  law  enforcement  authorities  (LEAs)  apply  or  intend  to  apply  facial  recognition technology (FRT). It may be used to authenticate or to identify a person and can be applied on videos (e.g. CCTV) or  photographs. It may be used for various purposes, including to search for persons  in police watch lists or to monitor a person's movements in the public space. FRT is  built on the processing of biometric data , therefore, it encompasses the processing of special categories ...

### Guidelines 02/2021 on virtual voice assistants

*EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/38077*

A virtual voice assistant (VVA) is a service that understands voice commands and executes them or mediates with other IT systems if needed. VVAs are currently available on most smartphones and tablets, traditional computers, and, in the latest years, even standalone devices like smart speakers. VVAs act as interface between users and their computing devices and online services such as search engines  or  online  shops.  Due  to  their  role,  VVAs  have  access  to  a  huge  amount  of  personal...

### EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)

*EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/126016*

1 Adopted EDPB - EDPS Joint Opinion 5 /2021 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmo nised rules on artificial i ntelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) 18 June 2021 2 Adopted Executive Summary On 2 1 April 2021, the European Commission presented its Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (hereinafter “the Proposal”) . The EDPB and the EDPS welcome…

### Richtsnoeren 02/2021 inzake virtuele spraakassistenten

*EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/38096*

Een virtuele spraakassistent ( virtual voice assistant , of VVA) betreft een dienst die spraakgestuurde opdrachten begrijpt en uitvoert, of indien nodig als tussenschakel optreedt naar andere IT-systemen. Tegenwoordig  is  een  VVA  als  optie  beschikbaar  op  de  meeste  smartphones,  tablets  en reguliere computers en sinds enkele jaren zelfs op losse apparaten zoals smartspeakers. Een VVA functioneert als schakel tussen de gebruiker en zijn apparaat of een online dienst zoals een zoekmachine...

## Related topics

- **Human Oversight** — https://overview.legal/topics/human-oversight-ai
  ## Legal Framework

---
Generated by overview.legal · https://overview.legal/laws/ai-act/art-14 · 2026-08-22
