In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification for products regulated by Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate that whenever a change occurs which may affect the compliance of a high-risk AI system with this Regulation (e.g. change of operating system or software architecture), or when the intended purpose of the system changes, that AI system should be considered to be a new AI system which should undergo a new conformity assessment. However, changes occurring to the algorithm and the performance of AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service, namely automatically adapting how functions are carried out, should not constitute a substantial modification, provided that those changes have been pre-determined by the provider and assessed at the moment of the conformity assessment.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 128
Related across sources
News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems? News A call to EU legislators: protect rights and reject the call to delete transparency safeguard in AI Act News The AI Act isn’t enough: closing the dangerous loopholes that enable rights violations News San Jose Can Protect Immigrants by Ending Flock Surveillance System Guidance Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation Guidance Version history