Moreover, in light of the very small size of some operators and in order to ensure proportionality regarding costs of innovation, it is appropriate to allow microenterprises to fulfil one of the most costly obligations, namely to establish a quality management system, in a simplified manner which would reduce the administrative burden and the costs for those enterprises without affecting the level of protection and the need for compliance with the requirements for high-risk AI systems. The Commission should develop guidelines to specify the elements of the quality management system to be fulfilled in this simplified manner by microenterprises.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 146
Related across sources
News The AI Act isn’t enough: closing the dangerous loopholes that enable rights violations News A call to EU legislators: protect rights and reject the call to delete transparency safeguard in AI Act News The AI law is not sufficient: we must address the dangerous loopholes that enable abuse and violate people's rights. News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems? News Canada Is Forging Ahead with Its Dangerous Surveillance Bill Guidance Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation