Skip to content
AI Act Recital 163 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 163 — scientific panel monitoring support for AI Office

In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

With a view to complementing the governance systems for general-purpose AI models, the scientific panel should support the monitoring activities of the AI Office and may, in certain cases, provide qualified alerts to the AI Office which trigger follow-ups, such as investigations. This should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model poses a concrete and identifiable risk at Union level. Furthermore, this should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model meets the criteria that would lead to a classification as general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. To equip the scientific panel with the information necessary for the performance of those tasks, there should be a mechanism whereby the scientific panel can request the Commission to require documentation or information from a provider.

Related across sources

Statement 3/2024 data protection authorities’ role in the Artificial Intelligence Act framework Final 1 Statement 3/2024 on data protection authorities’ role in the Artificial Intelligence Act framework Adopted on 16 July 2024 The European Data Protection Board has adopted… Statement ·EDPB Jul 16, 2024 Artificial Intelligence Single Point of Contact for AI Regulation Authority Cooperation
2023 EDPB Annual Report 2022 EDPB Annual Report 2022 1 2022 ANNUAL REPORT STREAMLINING ENFORCEMENT THROUGH COOPERATION An Executive Summary of this report, which provides an overview of key EDPB activities in… Apr 17, 2023 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Privacy Shield
€2M Garante fines Lusha Systems Inc. over unauthorized B2B contact database Lusha Systems Inc. (the controller) operated a subscription-based platform that provided professional contact information through a business-to-business (B2B) database. It was a… Italy ·Art. 3, 5, 6 +2 Jul 14, 2026 Personal Data IP Address Legitimate Interest
C-683/21 Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija The CJEU Grand Chamber issued a preliminary ruling in Case C-683/21, arising from a dispute between Lithuania's National Public Health Centre (NVSC) and the State Data Protection… CJEU ·Grand Chamber Dec 5, 2023 Controllers Personal Data Public Authority
C-604/22 IAB Europe v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In Case C-604/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal in proceedings between IAB Europe and the Belgian… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Mar 7, 2024 IP Address Controllers Personal Data