In order to ensure legal certainty, ensure an appropriate adaptation period for operators and avoid disruption to the market, including by ensuring continuity of the use of AI systems, it is appropriate that this Regulation applies to the high-risk AI systems that have been placed on the market or put into service before the general date of application thereof, only if, from that date, those systems are subject to significant changes in their design or intended purpose. It is appropriate to clarify that, in this respect, the concept of significant change should be understood as equivalent in substance to the notion of substantial modification, which is used with regard only to high-risk AI systems pursuant to this Regulation. On an exceptional basis and in light of public accountability, operators of AI systems which are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in an annex to this Regulation and operators of high-risk AI systems that are intended to be used by public authorities should, respectively, take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements of this Regulation by end of 2030 and by 2 August 2030.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 177
Related across sources
News A call to EU legislators: protect rights and reject the call to delete transparency safeguard in AI Act News The AI Act isn’t enough: closing the dangerous loopholes that enable rights violations Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement News The AI law is not sufficient: we must address the dangerous loopholes that enable abuse and violate people's rights. News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems? News HDPA (Greece) - 10/2026