Where, under the conditions laid down in this Regulation, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service should no longer be considered to be the provider for the purposes of this Regulation, and when that provider has not expressly excluded the change of the AI system into a high-risk AI system, the former provider should nonetheless closely cooperate and make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular regarding the compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 86
Related across sources
News A call to EU legislators: protect rights and reject the call to delete transparency safeguard in AI Act News The AI Act isn’t enough: closing the dangerous loopholes that enable rights violations News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems? Guidance Version history Guidance Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation News The AI law is not sufficient: we must address the dangerous loopholes that enable abuse and violate people's rights.