# Requests for access restrictions and cooperation with national courts — DSA — context bundle > Focused context for a single provision, curated from overview.legal on 2026-08-22. Canonical page: https://overview.legal/laws/dsa/art-82 > Every item cites its source. Verify against the official text (EUR-Lex / wetten.overheid.nl) before relying on it. ## Provision ### Requests for access restrictions and cooperation with national courts — Requests for access restrictions and cooperation with national courts *DSA, dsa-art-82-en — https://overview.legal/laws/dsa/art-82* 1. Where all powers pursuant to this Section to bring about the cessation of an infringement of this Regulation have been exhausted, the infringement persists and causes serious harm which cannot be avoided through the exercise of other powers available under Union or national law, the Commission may request the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment of the provider of the very large online platform or of the very large online search engine concerned to act pursuant to Article 51(3). - Prior to making such request to the Digital Services Coordinator, the Commission shall invite interested parties to submit written observations within a period that shall not be less than 14 working days, describing the measures it intends to request and identifying the intended addressee or addressees thereof. 2. Where the coherent application of this Regulation so requires, the Commission, acting on its own initiative, may submit written observations to the competent judicial authority referred to Article 51(3). With the permission of the judicial authority in question, it may also make oral observations. - For the purpose of the preparation of its observations only, the Commission may request that judicial authority to transmit or ensure the transmission to it of any documents necessary for the assessment of the case. 3. When a national court rules on a matter which is already the subject matter of a decision adopted by the Commission under this Regulation, that national court shall not take any decision which runs counter to that Commission decision. National courts shall also avoid taking decisions which could conflict with a decision contemplated by the Commission in proceedings it has initiated under this Regulation. To that effect, a national court may assess whether it is necessary to stay its proceedings. This is without prejudice to Article 267 TFEU. ## Guidance ### EDPB-werkprogramma: vier pijlers met plannen voor richtsnoeren over AI, anonimisering en *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/53737* Het werkprogramma is opgebouwd rond vier pijlers: Pijler I: richt zich op harmonisatie en compliance: praktische guidance, templates (voor o.a. DPIA's, dataleknotificaties, privacy notices) en specifieke ondersteuning voor het mkb. Pijler II: draait om handhaving en samenwerking tussen toezichtho... ### Report on stakeholder event on anonymisation and pseudonymisation of 12 December 2025 *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/125688* Report on stakeholder event on anonymisation and pseudonymisation of 12 December 2025 1. Background The EDPB organise d a remote stakeholder event on 12 December 2025 to collect stakeholders’ input on anonymisation and pseudonymisation , following the Court of Justice of the European Union ( “ CJEU ” ) judgment in case EDPS v SRB 1 . The objective was to engage with stakeholders to inform the EDPB’s ongoing work on its guidelines 01/2025 on pseudonymisation and f orthcoming guidelines on… ### Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/38076* The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party issued these guidelines (WP260 rev.01), adopted on 29 November 2017 and last revised on 11 April 2018, to provide interpretive and practical guidance on the transparency requirements under the GDPR (Articles 12–14). The document addresses the form, timing, content, and modalities of information provided to data subjects, including issues such as plain language, layered privacy notices, information for children, and exceptions to the obligation to provide information. No fines or enforcement actions are imposed, as this is a guidance document rather than an enforcement decision. ### Artikel 29-werkgroep: richtsnoeren transparantie onder de AVG *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/38104* De Groep gegevensbescherming artikel 29 heeft richtsno ### One-Stop-Shop case digest on right of access *EDPB — https://overview.legal/posts/50410* EDPB/SPE 16 jan 2025 One-Stop-Shop case digest on right of access. Een rapport opgesteld door Hanne Marie Motzfeldt (Københavns Universitet) waarin beslissingen inzake het inzagerecht onder het eenloketmechanisme worden geanalyseerd. ## Related topics - **Inspection Access Rights and Cooperation Obligations** — https://overview.legal/topics/inspection-access-rights-obligations ## Legal Framework --- Generated by overview.legal · https://overview.legal/laws/dsa/art-82 · 2026-08-22