Where a court seized of proceedings against a decision by a supervisory authority has reason to believe that proceedings concerning the same processing, such as the same subject matter as regards processing by the same controller or processor, or the same cause of action, are brought before a competent court in another Member State, it should contact that court in order to confirm the existence of such related proceedings. If related proceedings are pending before a court in another Member State, any court other than the court first seized may stay its proceedings or may, on request of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction in favour of the court first seized if that court has jurisdiction over the proceedings in question and its law permits the consolidation of such related proceedings. Proceedings are deemed to be related where they are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them together in order to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings.
GDPR Recital EN
Recital 144
Related across sources
News The Italian Supervisory Authority fined a company 120 000 EUR for tracking five employees who drove company cars Guidance Version history Guidance Guidelines 9/2022 on personal data breach notification under GDPR Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement Enforcement Municipality of Ede: Insufficient legal basis for data processing Enforcement Municipality of Delft: Insufficient legal basis for data processing