GDPR Recital 66 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 66 — right to erasure online environment

Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Controllers
In force — consolidated2016-05-04 · CELEX 02016R0679-20160504 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2016-05-04in force CELEX 02016R0679-20160504
  • 2016-04-27 CELEX 32016R0679

To strengthen the right to be forgotten in the online environment, the right to erasure should also be extended in such a way that a controller who has made the personal data public should be obliged to inform the controllers which are processing such personal data to erase any links to, or copies or replications of those personal data. In doing so, that controller should take reasonable steps, taking into account available technology and the means available to the controller, including technical measures, to inform the controllers which are processing the personal data of the data subject's request.

Related across sources

Case C 312/24 Darashev CJEU C-312/24 Darashev: Data subject's right to erasure of criminal investigation data The data subject is a police officer, holding various positions at the Internal Security directorate-general of the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior (controller). In March 2016,… Sep 4, 2025 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Controllers
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-129/21 Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In a preliminary ruling requested by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed the interpretation of Article 12 of Directive 2002/58/EC… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 27, 2022 Telecommunications Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
Guidelines 5/2019 criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1) Guidelines ·EDPB Jul 7, 2020 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Rectification
C-460/20 TU and RE v Google LLC In Case C-460/20, the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) concerning two individuals' request that Google… CJEU ·Grand Chamber Dec 8, 2022 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Accuracy