Skip to content
Literature · European Law Journal EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Unveiling transparency in data protection enforcement across the EU: Assessing the level and quality of disclosure of GDPR fines by data protection authorities

Pablo Marcello Baquero, Aluna Wang, David Restrepo Amariles — European Law Journal

European Law Journal
DOI

How it connects

Enforcement Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 487/2026 Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) Enforcement Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 419/2026 Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) Case Law Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 63 – Consistency mechanism – Article 65 – Dispute resolution by the European Data Protection Board – Binding decision – Action for annulment – First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Act open to challenge – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the Court of Justice of the European Union Guidance Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) EDPB Case Law Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 13(1) and (2) – Unsolicited communications – Concept of communication ‘for the purposes of di Court of Justice of the European Union Guidance Coordinated Enforcement Action, implementation of the right of access by controllers EDPB

Full text

Abstract Despite the increasing recognition of data protection rights across the European Union (EU), evidence suggests they are often underenforced, thereby undermining the effectiveness of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This article shows that an often neglected aspect in GDPR enforcement is the variability in transparency exhibited by data protection authorities across EU Member States concerning the disclosure of fines. To bridge this research gap, we gathered data from 23 out of 27 EU data protection authorities (DPAs) and built an indicator to measure their level and quality of fines' disclosure. Our research uncovers disparities in the disclosure of GDPR fines across the EU. We examine the consequences of different levels of disclosure for individuals, entities, regulatory authorities and the data protection system. We argue that harmonised standards of transparency are necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the GDPR and the fundamental right to data protection across the EU.

Similar Content