Literature · Law, State and Telecommunications Review EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

GDPR v. GDPL

Aline Iramina — Law, State and Telecommunications Review

Aline Iramina — Law, State and Telecommunications Review

Law, State and Telecommunications Review
DOI
Supervision Personal Data Telecommunications
Oct 13, 2020 Source doi.org

Full text

Purpose ”“ The main purpose of this article is to analyze the aspects of the responsiveness approach adopted by European and Brazilian lawmakers in the elaboration of data protection rules, such as GDPR and LGPD. Methodology ”“ The applied methodology is based on the responsive regulation theory and, additionally, the network governance theory, through the comparative analysis of personal data protection legal frameworks in Brazil and the EU. Findings ”“ Based on the comparative analysis of the GDPR and the LGPD, it is verified the adoption of escalated regulatory techniques of Ayres and Braithwaite’s enforcement pyramid in the developed of these norms, as a strategy adopted by lawmakers to guarantee a greater compliance from regulated entities.

How it connects

Related across sources

C-129/21 Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In a preliminary ruling requested by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed the interpretation of Article 12 of Directive 2002/58/EC… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 27, 2022 Right to be Forgotten Telecommunications Personal Data
C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) Het Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste Kamer) beantwoordt een prejudiciële vraag over de uitleg van artikel 13 van Richtlijn 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy) en de verhouding tot de GDPR,… CJEU Mar 27, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Marketing
C-511/18 La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Others The Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) addressed whether EU law permits Member States to legislate general and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location… CJEU ·Grand Chamber Oct 6, 2020 Telecommunications IP Address Storage Limitation
Opinion 5/2019 interplay between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, in particular regarding the competence, tasks and powers of data protection authorities Opinion ·EDPB Mar 12, 2019 Supervisory Authorities Telecommunications Supervision
C-597/19 Mircom International Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited v Telenet BVBA The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen (Belgium) in proceedings between Mircom International Content… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber Jun 17, 2021 Legitimate Interest IP Address Telecommunications
451423 French Supreme Court reviews CNIL €35M cookie consent fine against Amazon The French DPA had received a complaint on 28 May 2018 regarding the lawfulness of processing by Amazon Europe Core ('Provider' or 'The company'). The French DPA had forwarded… Supreme Administrative Court Jun 27, 2022 Consent Supervision Cookies
Related documents