Literature · Law, State and Telecommunications Review EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

GDPR v. GDPL

Aline Iramina — Law, State and Telecommunications Review

Law, State and Telecommunications Review
DOI
Telecommunications Personal Data Supervision
Oct 13, 2020 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Case Law TSJ PV - 1713/2026 High Court of Justice of the Basque Country Enforcement Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 10192784 Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) Enforcement AEPD (Spain) - EXP202310345 AEPD (Spain) Enforcement ICO (UK) - KRA Consultancy Ltd ICO (UK) Case Law CE - N. 433539 Supreme Administrative Court Enforcement Crowd Entertainment Ltd: Insufficient legal basis for data processing Romanian National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing (ANSPDCP)

Full text

Purpose ”“ The main purpose of this article is to analyze the aspects of the responsiveness approach adopted by European and Brazilian lawmakers in the elaboration of data protection rules, such as GDPR and LGPD. Methodology ”“ The applied methodology is based on the responsive regulation theory and, additionally, the network governance theory, through the comparative analysis of personal data protection legal frameworks in Brazil and the EU. Findings ”“ Based on the comparative analysis of the GDPR and the LGPD, it is verified the adoption of escalated regulatory techniques of Ayres and Braithwaite’s enforcement pyramid in the developed of these norms, as a strategy adopted by lawmakers to guarantee a greater compliance from regulated entities.

Original document at the source doi.org

Similar Content