Skip to content
Literature · Interactive Entertainment Law Review EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

It is not just a click: protection of in-game behaviour data as biometric data under the GDPR

Fatih Talha Boyraz — Interactive Entertainment Law Review

Fatih Talha Boyraz — Interactive Entertainment Law Review

Interactive Entertainment Law Review
DOI

Full text

This article investigates the potential classification of players’ in-game behaviour data from basic computer peripherals, like keyboards and mouses (behavioural telemetry), as biometric data under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Modern technologies allow these types of data to reveal a wealth of personal information, including age, gender, emotional states, collaboration abilities, problem-solving skills, economic status, consumption habits, and character traits. The analysis is structured into three sections: understanding the nature of in-game behaviour data, assessing its alignment with the GDPR’s definition of biometric data, and examining the repercussions for gaming companies if such data is deemed biometric. The conclusion asserts that behavioural telemetry and gameplay metrics can indeed be considered biometric under the GDPR, as it plays a crucial role in player identification and exhibits similarities with biometric systems in the context of game analytics processes. This classification implies heightened legal responsibilities for gaming companies, triggering risk-based provisions within the GDPR. The article introduces a novel perspective by suggesting that seemingly innocuous in-game behaviour data may fall under the purview of biometric data.

How it connects

C-57/23 JH v Policejní prezidium HvJ EU 20 november 2025, C-57/23, ECLI:EU:C:2025:905, (JH v Policejní prezidium). CJEU Nov 20, 2025 Types of Special Categories of Personal Data Genetic Data Criminal Data
C-446/12 W. P. Willems and Others v Burgemeester van Nuth and Others In Joined Cases C-446/12 to C-449/12, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Dutch Raad van State regarding whether… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Apr 16, 2015 Types of Special Categories of Personal Data Biometric Data Identification
C-61/22 RL v Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden The Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden in proceedings between RL and the… CJEU ·Grand Chamber Mar 21, 2024 Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Biometric Data Types of Special Categories of Personal Data
Opinion 11/2024 use of facial recognition to streamline airport passengers’ flow (compatibility with Articles 5(1)(e) and(f), 25 and 32 GDPR) A dopted Opinion 11/2024 on the use of facial recognition to streamline airport passengers’ flow (compatibility with Articles 5(1)(e) and(f), 25 and 32 GDPR Version 1.1 Adopted on… Opinion ·EDPB May 24, 2024 Biometric Data Storage Limitation Identification
C‑371/24 Comdribus In 2020, law enforcement officers arrested several people from a climate protest One of the individuals detained (the data subject) provided their identity, but refused to be fingerprinted and photographed, as well as to provide the code to their phone (or… C‑371/24 - Comdribus ·CJEU Mar 19, 2026 Personal Data Types of Special Categories of Personal Data Identification