Skip to content
Enforcement · ANSPDCP (Romania) ·Fine against There's an AI for that S.R.L EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Fine against There's an AI for that S.R.L

Status Not cited by any decision here yet

€30,000 Fine
Romania

Holding

The ANSPDCP found that the controller’s website stored cookies that were not technically necessary on users’ devices. The authority also found that users were not provided with clear and complete information about these cookies and that their explicit consent had not been obtained before such cookies were placed. The ANSPDCP held that the controller violated Article 4(5)(a) and Article 4(5)(b) of Law No. 506/2004 on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (implementing ePrivacy Directive). As a result, the authority imposed an administrative fine of RON 30,000 (€6,000) on the controller for processing data through non-essential cookies without proper information or consent.

From GDPRhub’s case note — a summary of the decision, not its own words. Read it in the text ↓

Full text

Machine translation of the decision, via GDPRhub — not the official text. Read the original

04.11.2025 Sanction for violation of Law no. 506/2004 The National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing completed, in October 2025, an investigation at the operator THERE’S AN AI FOR THAT S.R.L and found a violation of the provisions of art. 4 para. (5) let. a) and b) of Law no. 506/2004 on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector. As such, the operator was sanctioned with a fine of 30,000 lei. The investigation was initiated following a complaint by an individual regarding a possible violation of the provisions of the legislation in the field of personal data protection. During the investigation, the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing found that on the website owned by the operator, cookies were stored that were not technically necessary on the users' equipment, without clear and complete information and without the express consent of the data subjects. In this context, the operator was fined for violating the provisions of art. 4 para. (5) let. a) and b) of Law no. 506/2004. Legal and Communication Department A.N.S.P.D.C.P

How it connects

C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) Het Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste Kamer) beantwoordt een prejudiciële vraag over de uitleg van artikel 13 van Richtlijn 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy) en de verhouding tot de GDPR,… CJEU Mar 27, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Marketing
451423 French Supreme Court reviews CNIL €35M cookie consent fine against Amazon The French DPA had received a complaint on 28 May 2018 regarding the lawfulness of processing by Amazon Europe Core ('Provider' or 'The company'). The French DPA had forwarded… Supreme Administrative Court Jun 27, 2022 Consent Supervision Cookies
449209 CE asks CJEU if GDPR one-stop-shop applies to ePrivacy cookie consent cases On 7 December 2020, the French DPA (CNIL) imposed two fines totaling € 100 million on Google LLC and Google Ireland Ltd for violating Article 82 of the French Data Protection Act… Jan 28, 2022 Supervision Consent Supervisory Authorities
C-129/21 Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In a preliminary ruling requested by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed the interpretation of Article 12 of Directive 2002/58/EC… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 27, 2022 Right to be Forgotten Telecommunications Personal Data
473833 The DPA imposed an €8 million administrative fine on Apple (the controller) in 2022 (CNIL - SAN-2022-025) The DPA found that Apple used identifiers stored on users’ devices to enable personalized advertising in the App Store without first obtaining valid user consent, as required by… CE - 473833 ·Supreme Administrative Court Oct 10, 2025 Material scope (GDPR) Personal Data Controllers