Skip to content
News · Electronic Frontier Foundation EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

San Francisco: Don’t Fall for Industry Defense of Surveillance Pricing

The concept of “surveillance pricing” is just one part of a much larger problem and business model: corporations maximizing their profits by invading our privacy.

How it connects

C-496/17 Deutsche Post AG v Hauptzollamt Köln In a preliminary ruling arising from proceedings between Deutsche Post AG and the Hauptzollamt Köln, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted the second subparagraph… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 16, 2019 Personal Data Processing Monitoring
T-354/22 Thomas Bindl v European Commission In Case T-354/22, Thomas Bindl sought annulment of alleged personal data transfers to third countries by the European Commission when visiting the Conference on the Future of… General Court ·Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition Jan 8, 2025 International Transfer Personal Data Controllers
1713/2026 High Court of Justice of the Basque Country · TSJ PV - 1713/2026 The data subject had worked for Fineco Sociedad de Valores, SA and GIIC Fineco Sociedad Gestora de Instituciones de Inversión Colectiva, SAU, the controller, since 2004. The data… Jul 17, 2026 Personal Data Monitoring Supervision
22/01253 Dutch Supreme Court: patient not entitled to access peer-review assessment of medical file A patient (the data subject) was treated in a hospital. Because she believed that an error had been made, she held the hospital liable. The hospital involved its liability… Hoge Raad Aug 26, 2022 Right of Access Right of Access Procedures Personal Data

Full text

The concept of “surveillance pricing” is just one part of a much larger problem and business model: corporations maximizing their profits by invading our privacy. The all-too-common business model is to systematically harvest, collate, and store as much of our personal data as possible, and then monetize it through use and sale. When it comes to surveillance pricing, that looks like corporations offering the same product to two different people at two different prices, based on harvested personal information. That's why EFF supports A.B. 2654, authored by Assemblymember Chris Ward, which bans this harmful practice. As an organization based in San Francisco, EFF was proud to learn that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors had also introduced a resolution to similarly support the legislation. However, we were disappointed to learn the San Francisco Board of Supervisors has since stalled a vote on the resolution stating their own support for A.B. 2654 after receiving an email from the S