# Rb. Den Haag - C/09/697386 / HA ZA 26-52

- Type: Case Law
- Source: Rb. Den Haag
- Date: 2026-09-15
- Original: https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Rb._Den_Haag_-_C/09/697386_/_HA_ZA_26-52
- Canonical: https://overview.legal/posts/353959
- Topics: Personal Data, Controllers, Access Controls, AI Value Chain Actors and Roles, Right of Access Procedures

## Summary

A court held that an Article 15 GDPR claim was inadmissible because a for-profit organisation acted on behalf of the data subjects without meeting the requirements of Article 80(1) GDPR. English Summary. Facts. The District Court of The Hague (the Court) considered an action brought by 51 individuals who had participated in online gambling offered through Unibet before 1 October 2021. At that time, the relevant websites were operated by Risepoint Limited, formerly Trannel International Ltd. Rise

## Full text

A court held that an Article 15 GDPR claim was inadmissible because a for-profit organisation acted on behalf of the data subjects without meeting the requirements of Article 80(1) GDPR. English Summary. Facts. The District Court of The Hague (the Court) considered an action brought by 51 individuals who had participated in online gambling offered through Unibet before 1 October 2021. At that time, the relevant websites were operated by Risepoint Limited, formerly Trannel International Ltd. Risepoint was the controller in relation to the personal data concerned. Kindred Group Limited had previously been the parent company of Risepoint. The data subjects had authorised Dynamiet Nederland B.V., a commercial legal services provider, to act on their behalf in matters relating to gambling losses. The authorisation expressly included submitting access requests under Article 15 GDPR concerning account and transaction data held by online gambling providers. Between December 2024 and January 20

---
Generated by overview.legal · https://overview.legal/posts/353959 · 2026-09-15