# BGH - VI ZR 144/23

- Type: Case Law
- Source: BGH
- Date: 2026-09-22
- Original: https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=BGH_-_VI_ZR_144/23
- Canonical: https://overview.legal/posts/354169
- Topics: Personal Data, IP Address, Controllers

## Summary

The Federal Court of Justice held that a claim for injunctive relief under national law directed against the repeated transfer of personal data in violation of the GDPR cannot be rejected on the grounds that the provisions of EU law are exhaustive. English Summary. Facts. The operator of an online store (the controller) had embedded third-party features in its websites. As a result of this practice, the data of users accessing the website (the data subjects) was stored on servers operated by thi

## Full text

The Federal Court of Justice held that a claim for injunctive relief under national law directed against the repeated transfer of personal data in violation of the GDPR cannot be rejected on the grounds that the provisions of EU law are exhaustive. English Summary. Facts. The operator of an online store (the controller) had embedded third-party features in its websites. As a result of this practice, the data of users accessing the website (the data subjects) was stored on servers operated by third parties. A data subject who had ordered goods from the controller's online store argued that his name, address, IP address, and numerous pieces of usage data from the ordering process had been unlawfully transferred to third parties. The data subject filed a lawsuit requesting an injunction to stop these transfers of personal data. The court of first instance dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that it was inadmissible due to a lack of specificity. It also held the lawsuit was without m

---
Generated by overview.legal · https://overview.legal/posts/354169 · 2026-09-22