Enforcement · Belgian Data Protection Authority (APD) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Google Belgium SA: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights

The Belgian data protection authority has fined Google Belgium SA, a subsidiary of Google, 600,000 euros.

€600,000 Fine
Google Belgium SA
BELGIUM
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR Art. 17 GDPR Art. 12 GDPR
Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Transparency Fairness & Transparency Supervisory Authorities
Jul 14, 2020 Source autoriteprotectiondonnees.be

Full text

The Belgian data protection authority has fined Google Belgium SA, a subsidiary of Google, 600,000 euros. The reasons for the fine were the rejection of an application by a data subject for dereferencing outdated articles that the data subject had considered to be damaging to its reputation, and lack of transparency in Google's form for dereferencing applications. The Belgian data protection authority found that articles relating to unfounded harassment complaints could have serious consequences for the data subjects, and natural persons were therefore entitled to have articles deleted/dereferenced. This also applies to persons who hold political office, even though these offices are generally less worthy of protection due to their public status and articles relating to political persons may therefore be stored for a longer period of time. Google's rejection of the application was therefore in breach of Article 17 of the GDPR (fine for this breach: €500,000). In addition, a further €100,000 was imposed for breach of the principle of transparency, as Google's rejection of the request for deletion was not sufficiently justified

Industry: Media, Telecoms and Broadcasting

How it connects

References

Related across sources

C-154/21 RW v Österreichische Post AG The Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber), in response to a preliminary reference from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court), interpreted Article… CJEU ·First Chamber Jan 12, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Recipient
C-422/24 Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik. A new page has been created with the following information: "" CJEU Jan 7, 2026 Personal Data Fairness & Transparency Controllers
C-579/21 Proceedings brought by J.M In Case C-579/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Itä-Suomen hallinto-oikeus (Administrative Court of Eastern Finland)… CJEU ·First Chamber Jun 22, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-203/22 CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien In Case C-203/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 15(1)(h) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien… CJEU ·First Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
Guidelines 5/2019 criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1) Guidelines ·EDPB Jul 7, 2020 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Rectification
C-487/21 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v CRIF C-487/21 (Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde) CJEU Oct 26, 2023 Right of Access Right to Restriction Personal Data
Related documents