Skip to content
Enforcement · Norwegian Supervisory Authority (Datatilsynet) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Dragefossen AS: Insufficient legal basis for data processing

The Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) imposed a fine of EUR 14,900 on the energy company Dragefossen AS.

€14,900 Fine
Dragefossen AS
NORWAY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) imposed a fine of EUR 14,900 on the energy company Dragefossen AS. The latter had installed a webcam on the roof of its office building in the center of Rognan which was in operation 24/7 and recorded the city center. These recordings could be viewed via a live video stream on Youtube and on the controller's homepage. In addition, the recordings could be rewound for up to twelve hours. The area covered by the camera surveillance included a public street, the parking lot and entrance of two grocery stores, a pharmacy, a liquor store, the local bank, city hall, and a number of other buildings. It was not possible to make out facial details or read license plates on cars due to the image quality and distance from the camera. Nevertheless, the image quality was good enough to be able to identify what type of car the data subjects were driving, what type of clothing they were wearing, what hair color they had, and other personal characteristics.

§

This was sufficient for those watching the live broadcast to identify and track co-workers, colleagues, friends, family, or other acquaintances. The Norwegian DPA concluded that the live broadcast constitutes a breach of Art. 6 (1) GDPR and Art. 5 (1) a) GPDR. The decision highlights that the illegal camera surveillance involved a significant number of employees and that many were monitored repeatedly, some on a daily basis. Those who were monitored were on their way to and from work, who needed to buy groceries, medications, or alcohol, or who were in the public area for other reasons. These are activities where the data subjects do not expect to be monitored, and even less they expect the monitoring to be broadcast live on the Internet. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) a) GPDR, Art. 6 (1) GDPR Industry: Transportation and Energy

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-422/24 Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik. A new page has been created with the following information: "" CJEU Jan 7, 2026 Personal Data Fairness & Transparency Controllers
10 A 5144/23 VG Hannover: Controller appeals DPA reprimand over unlawful workplace video surveillance The owner of a doner kebab production facility (the controller) had installed video cameras to monitor virtually every room of the business premises. Cameras were placed in the… Administrative Court Hannover Aug 7, 2026 Controllers Supervisory Authorities Legitimate Interest
42 K 51.25 VG Berlin: DPA correctly found residential video surveillance for property protection The property management company of a high-rise building (the controller) had a video surveillance system installed at the entrances of the building in 2021. The installation was… Administrative Court Berlin Apr 20, 2026 Legitimate Interest Supervisory Authorities Retention Period
703/2026 Sibiu Tribunal: rail company liable for refusal of CCTV access request On 5 June 2025, an individual (the data subject) made an access request under Article 15 GDPR to the Romanian National Railways Company, Societatea Națională de Căi Ferate SA (the… Jul 3, 2026 Right of Access Personal Data Legitimate Interest
1713/2026 High Court of Justice of the Basque Country · TSJ PV - 1713/2026 The data subject had worked for Fineco Sociedad de Valores, SA and GIIC Fineco Sociedad Gestora de Instituciones de Inversión Colectiva, SAU, the controller, since 2004. The data… Jul 17, 2026 Personal Data Controllers Monitoring