Skip to content
Enforcement · Deputy Data Protection Ombudsman EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

ParkkiPate Oy: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights

The Finnish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 75,000 on ParkkiPate Oy.

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Finnish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 75,000 on ParkkiPate Oy. A number of people had been issued parking tickets by the controller and had thereupon requested information about which personal data was being processed and, in some cases, requested the deletion of their data. However, in order to process the requests, the controller stated that it needed the ID card number and address of the data subjects for identification purposes, as their name with the parking ticket number was not sufficient to verify their identity. According to the DPA, the controller has not only violated its duty to inform the data subjects and the right to delete their data, but has also violated the principle of data minimization. The DPA stressed that it is permitted to request further proof of identification if there are reasonable doubts about the identity of the data subject. However, in the cases in question, no such doubts had existed.

§

Furthermore, the DPA found a violation of the principle of storage limitation. The controller had stored photos of incorrectly parked cars and copies of parking tickets for possible future disputes in court without having defined a deadline for the deletion of the data. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR, Art. 12 (3), (4), (6) GDPR, Art. 14 (2) a) GDPR, Art. 14 (3) GDPR, Art. 15 GDPR, Art. 17 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 25 (2) GDPR Industry: Industry and Commerce

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-77/21 Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In this preliminary ruling, the CJEU interpreted Articles 5(1)(b) and 5(1)(e) GDPR in proceedings between Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. and the Hungarian National Authority… First Chamber Oct 20, 2022 Retention Period Storage Limitation Personal Data
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-231/22 État belge v Autorité de protection des données In Case C-231/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 4(7) and Article 5(2) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court… Third Chamber Jan 11, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Public Authority
C-638/23 Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde In Case C-638/23, the Court of Justice interpreted Article 4(7) GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof in proceedings between the Amt… Eighth Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Public Authority Controllers Personal Data
C-175/20 SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests In Case C-175/20, the Court of Justice of the EU interpreted GDPR Articles 5 and 6 in response to a preliminary ruling from the Latvian Regional Administrative Court concerning a… Fifth Chamber Feb 24, 2022 Retention Period Personal Data Legitimate Interest
C-446/21 Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited In a preliminary ruling arising from proceedings between Maximilian Schrems and Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted GDPR… Fourth Chamber Oct 4, 2024 Retention Period Personal Data Marketing