Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata di Roma: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Italian DPA (Garante) has imposed a fine of EUR 15,000 on Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata di Roma.

€15,000 Fine
Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata di Roma
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 13 GDPR Art. 25 GDPR Art. 32 GDPR
Privacy by Design & Default Personal Data Controllers Security Supervisory Authorities
Apr 21, 2021 Source garanteprivacy.it

Full text

The Italian DPA (Garante) has imposed a fine of EUR 15,000 on Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata di Roma. In February 2020, a data subject filed a complaint with Garante alleging a breach of data protection laws in relation to the booking services for medical specialists offered by the controller. In order to book a relevant appointment on the booking portal, visitors had to fill out an online form in which various personal data was requested. As the DPA found, the controller had not implemented adequate technical and organizational measures to ensure the protection of data processing. In addition, the controller did not comply with its information obligations pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR, as it had not properly informed the data subjects about the processing of their personal data at the time of the data collection.

Industry: Health Care

How it connects

References

Related across sources

Guidelines 4/2019 Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 Guidelines on data protection by design and by default Guidelines ·EDPB Oct 20, 2020 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Default Privacy by Design
14/2021 Cypriot court backs DPA fines of €40,000 each on football clubs and €25,000 on processor On 26 July 2021, a journalist informed the Cypriot DPA of a security vulnerability on an online platform. This online platform hosted ticket purchase sites of two Cypriot football… Administrative Court of Cyprus May 12, 2026 Controllers Processors Supervisory Authorities
C-311/18 Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems C-311/18 (Schrems II) CJEU Jul 16, 2020 Privacy Shield Processing Agreement International Transfer
Us I-4772/2023-10 A utility and municipal services enterprise, Zagrebački Holding d.o.o (the controller) provided users of its services with the option to request a copy of their bill via email. Where the name appearing in the email address differed from the user’s… US Zagreb - Us I-4772/2023-10 ·Administrative Court of Zagreb Jul 22, 2026 Personal Data Retention Period Controllers
15625/2026 Cass.Civ. - 15625/2026 Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS, the controller) is the Italian National Institute for Social Security. In 2021, the DPA fined the controller €300,000 for its… Supreme Court May 21, 2026 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Design DPIA
C-741/21 GP v juris GmbH In Case C-741/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) addressed a preliminary reference from the Landgericht Saarbrücken in proceedings between data subject… CJEU ·Third Chamber Apr 11, 2024 Liability Personal Data Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
Related documents