Enforcement · National Commission for Data Protection (CNPD) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

LUXEMBOURG DPA: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The DPA from Luxembourg (CNPD) has imposed a fine of EUR 2,600 on a company.

€2,600 Fine
Unknown
LUXEMBOURG
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 13 GDPR
Supervisory Authorities Retention Period Accountability Controllers Processing
May 12, 2021 Source cnpd.public.lu

Full text

The DPA from Luxembourg (CNPD) has imposed a fine of EUR 2,600 on a company. The controller had installed a video surveillance system to protect the company's assets and prevent entry by unauthorized persons.However, the cameras also excessively captured parts of the canteen which serves as a break location for employees. The DPA finds that recording employees during their break is not necessary to ensure the purposes related to the video surveillance and was therefore disproportionate. The DPA finds that the controller has thus violated the principle of data minimization under Article 5 (1) c) GDPR. In addition, the controller had not properly informed the data subjects about the processing of the data by the video surveillance and thus violated its duty to inform.

Industry: Employment

How it connects

References

Related across sources

10 A 5144/23 VG Hannover: Controller appeals DPA reprimand over unlawful workplace video surveillance The owner of a doner kebab production facility (the controller) had installed video cameras to monitor virtually every room of the business premises. Cameras were placed in the… Administrative Court Hannover Aug 7, 2026 Controllers Supervisory Authorities Legitimate Interest
C-231/22 État belge v Autorité de protection des données In Case C-231/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 4(7) and Article 5(2) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 11, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Public Authority
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-34/21 Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums In Case C-34/21, the Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium challenged the Hessian Ministry of Education's introduction of mandatory… CJEU ·First Chamber Mar 30, 2023 Material scope (GDPR) Consent Legitimate Interest
C-768/21 TR v Land Hessen In Case C-768/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning TR's challenge of… CJEU ·First Chamber Sep 26, 2024 Supervision Data Breaches Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
Related documents