Skip to content
Enforcement · Polish National Personal Data Protection Office (UODO) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Sopockie Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń ERGO Hestia S.A.: Insufficient fulfilment of data breach notification obligations

The controller had sent an email to that contained personal data of a customer to the wrong recipient.

€35,300 Fine
Sopockie Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń ERGO Hestia S.A.
POLAND
Art. 33 GDPR Art. 34 GDPR

Full text

The controller had sent an email to that contained personal data of a customer to the wrong recipient. The leaked data included data such as the name, postal address of the data subject and insurance details. In this context the controller had not informed either the Polish DPA nor the data subjects about the data breach in a timely manner within 72 hours.

Industry: Finance, Insurance and Consulting

How it connects

C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-687/21 BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH In Case C-687/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Articles 5, 24, 32, and 82 of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling request from the Amtsgericht… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 25, 2024 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Data Breaches