Skip to content
Enforcement · Deputy Data Protection Ombudsman EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Higher Education Institution: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Finnish DPA imposed a fine of EUR 25,000 on a higher education institution for data protection violations in the processing of employee location data.

€25,000 Fine
Higher Education Institution
FINLAND
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Finnish DPA imposed a fine of EUR 25,000 on a higher education institution for data protection violations in the processing of employee location data. The controller had introduced a mobile application that allowed teleworkers to clock in and out. The use of the application on a mobile device also required authorization for location data collection. The collection of location data at the time of clocking in was a feature of the app, without which it was not possible to clock in working hours using the app. According to the information received from the controller, the controller did not actively use or exploit the location data in any situation, but only processed the location data at the time of clocking in for technical reasons. However, the mere fact that time clocking is not possible in the application without processing the location data does not make it necessary to process them.

§

The DPA therefore considered this to be a violation of the lawfulness of the data collection and of the principle of data minimization, since the processing of location data was not necessary for the purpose of the processing - i.e., the mere recording of working hours. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR, Art. 6 GDPR, § 3 Law 759/2004 Industry: Employment

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-306/21 Komisia za zashtita na lichnite danni and Tsentralna izbiratelna komisia v Koalitsia „Demokratichna Bulgaria - Obedinenie“ In this preliminary ruling, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed whether the GDPR applies to the processing of personal data during national and European elections… CJEU ·Eighth Chamber Oct 20, 2022 Material scope (GDPR) Supervision Personal Data
C-768/21 TR v Land Hessen In Case C-768/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning TR's challenge of… CJEU ·First Chamber Sep 26, 2024 Supervision Data Breaches Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision
Guidelines 1/2020 processing personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications Guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices Guidelines ·EDPB Jan 28, 2020 Personal Data Privacy by Design & Default Processing