Enforcement · Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

UST GLOBAL ESPAÑA, S.A.: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

€3,000 Fine
UST GLOBAL ESPAÑA, S.A.
SPAIN
Art. 5 GDPR
Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Data Breaches IP Address Employees Processing Agreement Professional Secrecy Controllers Security
Jul 27, 2021 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Guidance Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) EDPB News DeFine is a calculator for GDPR fines based on method of the EDPB Kromann Reumert Guidance Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR EDPB Guidance Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 EDPB Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Hungary: Introduction to the GDPR Application and a Brief History of Data Protection European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Netherlands: The GDPR Implementation Act European Data Protection Law Review

Full text

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) has imposed a fine of EUR 3,000 on UST GLOBAL ESPAÑA, S.A.. An employee filed a complaint against the controller with the DPA. UST GLOBAL ESPAÑA, S.A. was acting as a service provider for OpenBank as part of a project. On 08.01.2020, the controller informed OpenBank by email that two new employees (one of them the complainant) would join the project, for which it requested access to the VPN and other applications. This email, which was sent with a copy to both employees, included their first and last names, professional email addresses, and ID card numbers. This way, both gained mutual unauthorized access to their colleague's data. The DPA considered this to be a violation of the principle of integrity and confidentiality.

Industry: Employment

Original document at the source www.aepd.es

Similar Content