Skip to content
Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a.: Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security

The identity of whistleblowers must be protected by special confidentiality rules, as the information processed is particularly sensitive and the risk of retaliation and discrimination in the work environment is high.

€40,000 Fine
Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a.
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 25 GDPR Art. 32 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The identity of whistleblowers must be protected by special confidentiality rules, as the information processed is particularly sensitive and the risk of retaliation and discrimination in the work environment is high. In this context, the controller is obliged to comply with the principles of data protection and to ensure the integrity and security of the data. Against this background, the Italian DPA (Garante) fined Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a. EUR 40,000 and its software supplier EUR 20,000 for violations of the GDPR. In the course of the DPA's investigation, it was found that the application for collecting and managing criminal reports was accessed without the use of a secure network protocol (e.g., the link protocol) and that the application itself did not provide for encryption of the reporting party's identification data, the information about the report and the attached documents.

§

The DPA considered this to be a violation of the obligation to take technical and organizational measures that ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk to the data subjects. In addition, the DPA found that the controller should have conducted an impact assessment, given the sensitivity of the information processed and the risks and vulnerability of the data subjects. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 25 GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR Industry: Industry and Commerce

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
Guidelines 1/2020 processing personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications Guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices Guidelines ·EDPB Jan 28, 2020 Personal Data Privacy by Design & Default Processing
C-687/21 BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH In Case C-687/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Articles 5, 24, 32, and 82 of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling request from the Amtsgericht… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 25, 2024 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Data Breaches
2022 EDPB Annual Report 2021 Enhancing the depth and breadth of data protection 2 EDPB Annual Report 2021 2 ENHANCING THE DEPTH AND BREADTH OF DATA PROTECTION An Executive Summary of this report, which… May 12, 2022 Privacy Shield Processing Agreement International Transfer
15625/2026 Cass.Civ. - 15625/2026 Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS, the controller) is the Italian National Institute for Social Security. In 2021, the DPA fined the controller €300,000 for its… Supreme Court May 21, 2026 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Design DPIA