Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a.: Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security

€40,000 Fine
Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a.
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 25 GDPR Art. 32 GDPR
Encryption Security Professional Secrecy Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Privacy Impact Assessment DPIA Privacy by Design & Default IP Address
Jun 10, 2021 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Guidance Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 EDPB News Danish SA Declares Use of Google Analytics Unlawful Without Supplementary Measures Datatilsynet Guidance Guidelines 1/2020 on processing personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications EDPB Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement EDPB Guidance Guidelines 9/2022 on personal data breach notification under GDPR EDPB News De Deense beschermingsautoriteit (SA) heeft verklaard dat het gebruik van Google Analytics onrechtmatig is zonder aanvullende maatregelen. Datatilsynet

Full text

The identity of whistleblowers must be protected by special confidentiality rules, as the information processed is particularly sensitive and the risk of retaliation and discrimination in the work environment is high. In this context, the controller is obliged to comply with the principles of data protection and to ensure the integrity and security of the data. Against this background, the Italian DPA (Garante) fined Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a. EUR 40,000 and its software supplier EUR 20,000 for violations of the GDPR. In the course of the DPA's investigation, it was found that the application for collecting and managing criminal reports was accessed without the use of a secure network protocol (e.g., the link protocol) and that the application itself did not provide for encryption of the reporting party's identification data, the information about the report and the attached documents. The DPA considered this to be a violation of the obligation to take technical and organizational measures that ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk to the data subjects. In addition, the DPA found that the controller should have conducted an impact assessment, given the sensitivity of the information processed and the risks and vulnerability of the data subjects.

Industry: Industry and Commerce

Original document at the source www.gpdp.it

Similar Content