Skip to content
Enforcement · Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

CEDICO, CENTRO DE DIAGNÓSTICO POR LA IMÁGEN, S.L.: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) has imposed a fine on CEDICO, CENTRO DE DIAGNÓSTICO POR LA IMÁGEN, S.L..

€18,000 Fine
CEDICO, CENTRO DE DIAGNÓSTICO POR LA IMÁGEN, S.L.
SPAIN
Art. 5 GDPR

Full text

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) has imposed a fine on CEDICO, CENTRO DE DIAGNÓSTICO POR LA IMÁGEN, S.L.. The data subject filed a complaint with the AEPD. He had requested an MRI scan of his knee due to an accident at work. In addition, he had contacted his insurance company in order to obtain a sick leave. The insurance company then contacted the controller, who transmitted the data subject's medical records. In doing so, the controller also provided the insurer with the report of a previous MRI scan of the knee that the data subject had undergone due to an event outside of work. In its evaluation, the insurer thus also referred to the MRI report outside working hours and attributed the data subject's incapacity to work to this event. In consequence, no sick leave was granted to the data subject. The DPA considered the disclosure of the earlier MRI report to the insurance company to be a violation of the principle of integrity and confidentiality. The original fine of EUR 30,000 was reduced to EUR 18,000 due to the voluntary payment and admission of guilt.

Industry: Health Care

How it connects

C-667/21 ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts The CJEU (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Bundesarbeitsgericht in a case where ZQ sought compensation from his employer, Medizinischer Dienst der… CJEU ·Third Chamber Dec 21, 2023 Health Data Healthcare Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
S 5 SF 65/24 DS SG Nürnberg: MOVEit zero-day cyberattack via processor did not breach Art. 32 GDPR The data subject (a child born in 2018), represented by her parents, was insured with the controller (a statutory health insurance provider) and participated in its digital bonus… Social Court Nuremberg Jun 10, 2026 Processors Controllers Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
W292 2292202-1 The data subject is in the military The unit he is employed at (controller) and the data subject are involved in a multitude of legal disputes concerning his employment, disciplinary proceedings, data protection… BVwG - W292 2292202-1 ·Federal Administrative Court Jun 30, 2026 Health Data Legitimate Interest Healthcare
III C 904/23 SO Warszawa - III C 904/23 The Financial Ombudsman’s office (the controller) sent a letter containing the name, the address, and the case reference number of a customer (the data subject) to 28,366 public… Regional Court in Warsaw Feb 16, 2026 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Personal Data
BA-6S/221/2019 Court upholds €50,000 fine on Sociálna poisťovňa for sending sensitive data by ordinary Sociálna poisťovňa, the social insurance agency (the controller), processes applications for foreign invalidity pensions and forwards related documents to the social insurance… Jun 25, 2025 Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Personal Data Data Breaches
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data