Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Comune di Montalbano Jonico: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Italian DPA (Garante) has imposed a fine of EUR 5,000 on the municipality of Montalbano Jonico.

€5,000 Fine
Comune di Montalbano Jonico
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR Art. 9 GDPR Art. 2 GDPR
Retention Period Personal Data Processing Public Authority Supervisory Authorities
Sep 16, 2021 Source gpdp.it

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Italian DPA (Garante) has imposed a fine of EUR 5,000 on the municipality of Montalbano Jonico. An individual had filed a complaint against the municipality with the DPA. He complained that a document was publicly available on the municipality's website, which contained personal data about himself and his father. Under the 'Documents and Data' section of the website, the files of the municipality could be viewed. In this context, it was possible to access a decision on a settlement for the overcoming and removal of architectural barriers in their home by filling out the corresponding search form. The decision clearly contained personal data and information in the text and subject line, such as the name of the complainant and his dependent father, with a reference to his situation as a disabled person. The text of the decision also contained the complainant's date of birth and place of residence, as well as information about the settlement sum.

Personal Data Public Authority Supervisory Authorities
§

The DPA considered the the publication with indication of the data to be a violation of the principle of data minimization. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) a), c) GDPR, Art. 6 (1) c), e) GDPR, Art. 6 (2) GDPR, Art. 6 (3) b) GDPR, Art. 9 (1), (2), (4) GDPR, Art. 2-ter (1), (3) Codice della privacy, Art. 2-septies (8) Codice della privacy Industry: Public Sector and Education

Retention Period Public Authority Supervisory Authorities applies Art. 5(1)Art. 6(1)Art. 6(2)Art. 6(3)

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓

References

All 9

Related across sources

C-231/22 État belge v Autorité de protection des données In Case C-231/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 4(7) and Article 5(2) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court… Third Chamber Jan 11, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Public Authority
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-638/23 Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde In Case C-638/23, the Court of Justice interpreted Article 4(7) GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof in proceedings between the Amt… Eighth Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Public Authority Controllers Personal Data
HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse) Artikelen: 5(1)(c), 6(1), en 21 AVG Onderwerp : Beginsel van minimale gegevensverwerking Gek genoeg verwijst het HvJ EU zelf niet naar HvJ EU 1 augustus 2022, C‑184/20… HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse). Jan 9, 2025 IP Address Retention Period Identification
C-621/22 Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennisbond v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens The CJEU ruled on a preliminary reference from the Amsterdam District Court in proceedings between the Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennisbond (KNLTB) and the Dutch Data… Ninth Chamber Oct 4, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest IP Address
Related documents