Skip to content
Enforcement · Belgian Data Protection Authority (APD) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Roularta Media Group: Insufficient legal basis for data processing

The Belgian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 50,000 on Roularta Media Group.

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Belgian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 50,000 on Roularta Media Group. As part of its investigation, the DPA found that the cookie management on two websites operated by Roularta did not comply with the GDPR. In order to use cookies, controllers must obtain prior consent from the user, except in cases where the cookies are strictly necessary for website operation. The DPA found that consent to the processing of personal data through cookies on websites operated by Roularta was not valid, as not all necessary conditions were met. As such, about 60 cookies that were not required had been placed by the websites on visitors' devices even before they had given their consent. Roularta had also failed to sufficiently inform users about cookies. In addition, the boxes for consent to the placement of cookies by third parties were checked in advance, although users must always actively consent.

§

In addition, the DPA found that users could not revoke their consent to cookie placement as easily as they had given it. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) e) GDPR, Art. 5 (2) GDPR, Art. 6 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 7 (1), (3) GDPR, Art. 12 GDPR, Art. 13 GDPR, Art. 14 GDPR, Art. 24 GDPR Industry: Media, Telecoms and Broadcasting

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-129/21 Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In a preliminary ruling requested by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed the interpretation of Article 12 of Directive 2002/58/EC… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 27, 2022 Telecommunications Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) Het Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste Kamer) beantwoordt een prejudiciële vraag over de uitleg van artikel 13 van Richtlijn 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy) en de verhouding tot de GDPR,… CJEU Mar 27, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Marketing
C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Romanian Curtea de Apel Bucureşti in proceedings between Inteligo Media SA and the Romanian… CJEU ·First Chamber Nov 13, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Legitimate Interest
3 O 762/19 LG Rostock: Pre-ticked cookie consent boxes invalid under Art 6(1)(a) GDPR The German consumer organisation Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (vzbv, the claimant) filed a lawsuit… Sep 15, 2020 Consent Legitimate Interest Controllers
451423 French Supreme Court reviews CNIL €35M cookie consent fine against Amazon The French DPA had received a complaint on 28 May 2018 regarding the lawfulness of processing by Amazon Europe Core ('Provider' or 'The company'). The French DPA had forwarded… Supreme Administrative Court Jun 27, 2022 Consent Cookies Supervision
449209 CE asks CJEU if GDPR one-stop-shop applies to ePrivacy cookie consent cases On 7 December 2020, the French DPA (CNIL) imposed two fines totaling € 100 million on Google LLC and Google Ireland Ltd for violating Article 82 of the French Data Protection Act… Jan 28, 2022 Consent Supervision Supervisory Authorities