Enforcement · Romanian National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing (ANSPDCP) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

S.C. Wine Point S.R.L.: Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security

€3,000 Fine
S.C. Wine Point S.R.L.
ROMANIA
Art. 32 GDPR
Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Professional Secrecy Security IP Address Personal Data Controllers Processing Agreement Privacy by Design & Default
Jun 15, 2022 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Guidance Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 EDPB News Danish SA Declares Use of Google Analytics Unlawful Without Supplementary Measures Datatilsynet News DeFine is a calculator for GDPR fines based on method of the EDPB Kromann Reumert Guidance Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR EDPB Guidance Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) EDPB Case Law VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite CJEU

Full text

The Romanian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 3,000 on S.C. Wine Point S.R.L.. A data subject had filed a complaint with the DPA for having received an advertising e-mail from the controller, which contained a distribution list in which the e-mail addresses of 810 other persons, as well as their own, were visible to the other recipients. During its investigation, the DPA found that the controller had failed to take appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure the confidentiality of the personal data processed.

Industry: Industry and Commerce

Original document at the source www.dataprotection.ro

Similar Content