Skip to content
Enforcement · Deputy Data Protection Ombudsman EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Otavamedia Oy: Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights

The Finnish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 85,000 on Otavamedia Oy.

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Finnish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 85,000 on Otavamedia Oy. The DPA had received eleven complaints regarding Otavamedia between 2018 and 2021. Namely, the complaints primarily concerned the lack of response to inquiries from data subjects. Otavamedia explained that some of the privacy requests had not been fulfilled due to a technical problem with email management. During the incident, messages received in the privacy inquiry email box were not forwarded to customer service representatives. The situation had only been discovered after seven months. In this context, the DPA noted that Otovamia should have tested the new e-mail system before using it in order to be able to guarantee the response to the requests and the rights of the data subjects. Analogous request were possible, but the request form had to be signed by the data subjects for identification purposes. However, Otavamedia was not processing the signature data in any other contexts, so the signature could not even be cross-checked.

§

The DPA concluded that Otavamedia thereby collected an unnecessarily large amount of data for identification purposes and made the exercise of data subject rights harder by requiring signatures. GDPR Articles: Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR, Art. 12 (1), (2), (3), (4), (6) GDPR, Art. 15 GDPR, Art. 17 GDPR, Art. 25 GDPR Industry: Media, Telecoms and Broadcasting

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
CJEU Bavarian Lager: Disclosing personal data in access-to-documents requests is Processing: Communication of personal data in response to a request for access to documents constitutes processing. (¶69) Jun 29, 2010 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Right to Restriction
C-507/17 Google LLC v CNIL C-507/17 (Google Territorial Scope) CJEU Sep 24, 2019 Territorial scope (GDPR) Right to be Forgotten Direct Marketing
CJEU: Processing of beneficiary data not based on consent; individuals must be informed Purpose for processing: The legislation at issue does base the processing on consent. Rather, it provides that they are to be informed. Thus, processing is not based on their… Nov 9, 2010 Consent Personal Data Right to Restriction