Skip to content
Enforcement · Portuguese Data Protection Authority (CNPD) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Setúbal municipality: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Portuguese DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 170,000 on Setúbal municipality.

€180,000 Fine
Setúbal municipality
PORTUGAL
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 13 GDPR Art. 37 GDPR

Full text

The Portuguese DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 170,000 on Setúbal municipality. The DPA found data protection violations regarding the collection of personal data from Ukrainian refugees. The municipality had asked refugees to fill out a form at the time of their arrival and provide various details on personal data, such as name, date of birth, marital status, etc. The DPA noted, that the municipality had not sufficiently informed the data subjects about the data processing. In addition, the DPA found that the municipality had failed to implement sufficient technical and organizational to protect personal data, as well as to define a retention period for the data. The municipality had also failed to appoint a data protection officer.

Industry: Public Sector and Education

How it connects

C-231/22 État belge v Autorité de protection des données In Case C-231/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 4(7) and Article 5(2) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court… Third Chamber Jan 11, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Public Authority
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-638/23 Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde In Case C-638/23, the Court of Justice interpreted Article 4(7) GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof in proceedings between the Amt… Eighth Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Public Authority Controllers Personal Data
C-175/20 SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests In Case C-175/20, the Court of Justice of the EU interpreted GDPR Articles 5 and 6 in response to a preliminary ruling from the Latvian Regional Administrative Court concerning a… Fifth Chamber Feb 24, 2022 Retention Period Personal Data Legitimate Interest
C-446/21 Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited In a preliminary ruling arising from proceedings between Maximilian Schrems and Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted GDPR… Fourth Chamber Oct 4, 2024 Retention Period Personal Data Marketing
C-740/22 Endemol Shine Finland Oy In Case C-740/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Itä-Suomen hovioikeus (Court of Appeal, Eastern Finland)… Sixth Chamber Mar 7, 2024 Criminal Data Personal Data Types of Special Categories of Personal Data