Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Tarento municipality: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations

€150,000 Fine
Tarento municipality
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 12 GDPR Art. 13 GDPR Art. 14 GDPR Art. 28 GDPR Art. 35 GDPR
Video Surveillance DPIA Monitoring Social Media Privacy Impact Assessment Public Authority IP Address Education
Apr 28, 2022 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Literature General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ambiguity, national diversity and data protection officer certification: Implementing Art. 39(1) GDPR in France, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain Journal of Data Protection Privacy Guidance Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR EDPB Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Hungary: Introduction to the GDPR Application and a Brief History of Data Protection European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Netherlands: The GDPR Implementation Act European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Romania: Overview of the GDPR Implementation European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Spain: Preparations for a New Law on Data Protection to Implement the GDPR European Data Protection Law Review

Full text

The Italian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 150,000 on Tarento municipality. The company Amiu S.p.A had operated the local waste collection service on behalf of the municipality. The company had installed several video surveillance cameras with the permission of the municipality to monitor illegal waste disposal. The DPA found that Amiu had posted some images from the cameras on Facebook, showing individuals sufficiently visible making it possible to identify them. During its investigation, the DPA also found that the municipality had not properly regulated the processing with Amiu S.p.A. In addition, the DPA found that the municipality had not provided sufficient information about the video surveillance cameras. The municipality also failed to conduct a data protection impact assessment regarding the installation of the cameras, which would have been necessary for such a large-scale systematic surveillance.

Industry: Public Sector and Education

Original document at the source www.gpdp.it

Similar Content