Enforcement · Belgian Data Protection Authority (APD) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Black Tiger Belgium: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations
How it connects
Related across sources
Guidance Guidelines 2/2020 on articles 46 (2) (a) and 46 (3) (b) of Regulation 2016/679 for transfers of personal data between EEA and non-EEA public authorities and bodies Case Law GC and Others v CNIL Guidance Guidelines 10/2020 on restrictions under Article 23 GDPR Guidance Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 Literature HOW GDPR TREATS AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement
Full text
The Belgian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 174,640 on Black Tiger Belgium. An individual had filed a complaint with the DPA due to the controller's failure to properly comply with their request to exercise their right of access. During its investigation, the DPA further found that the controller had processed personal data in various databases without sufficiently informing the data subjects. The DPA also found that the data retention period of 15 years was excessively long and not necessary. Finally, the DPA found that the company's register of processing activities lacked information.
Industry: Industry and Commerce
Original document at the source www.autoriteprotectiondonnees.be