News · GDPRhub EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

OGS Zagreb - Case number Pn-1378/2023-18.

Liability Controllers Law Enforcement
Jan 13, 2026
Summary

Summary: A court has awarded €3,500 to a person whose financial data was accidentally sent to another customer by a bank. The court ruled that this unauthorized disclosure constituted a violation of the person's right to privacy and that non-pecuniary damages were involved. Summary: A court has awarded €3,500 to a person whose financial data was accidentally sent to another customer by a bank. The court ruled that this unauthorized disclosure constituted a violation of the person's right to privacy and that non-pecuniary damages were involved. Summary. Summary . Conclusion .

How it connects

Related across sources

Case Law CA - EWCA Civ 899 Vince v. Associated Newspapers Limited Court of Appeal Literature The Court of Justice on the Excessiveness of Access Requests under the GDPR European Journal of Risk Regulation Case Law Sibiu Tribunal: CNCF denied CCTV access request; court rules on immaterial damage claim Sibiu Tribunal Case Law SG Nürnberg - S 5 SF 65/24 DS Social Court Nuremberg Enforcement EDPB - Binding Decision 1/2026 EDPB Case Law Supreme Court upholds €300,000 fine against INPS for GDPR violations in COVID bonus data Supreme Court

Full text

A court has awarded €3,500 to an individual after a bank accidentally sent her financial data to another customer. The court ruled that this disclosure unlawfully violated her right to privacy and caused minor damages. A court has awarded €3,500 to an individual after a bank accidentally sent her financial data to another customer. The court ruled that this disclosure unlawfully violated her right to privacy and caused minor damages. The court ruled that the responsible party violated the data protection rights of the individual according to Croatian law, and that this violation resulted in minor damages. The court also mentioned a violation of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), without specifying particular articles. The court ruled that the responsible party violated the data protection rights of the individual according to Croatian law, and that this violation resulted in minor damages. The court also mentioned a violation of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), without specifying particular articles. --- This content has been automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language. --- This content was automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.

Similar Content