News · GDPRhub EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

SO Warszawa - Case C 310/23

Personal Data Right of Access Accuracy Information Provision Modalities and Communication Methods Controllers Supervisory Authorities Accountability Law Enforcement
Jan 13, 2026
Summary

Permanent link: The responsible party did not respond adequately and provided unclear information or referred the individual to third parties. As a result, the individual filed a complaint with the Data Protection Authority. The responsible party did not respond adequately and provided unclear information or referred the individual to third parties. As a result, the individual filed a complaint with the Data Protection Authority. The Data Protection Authority has issued a final decision in which the responsible party is warned for violating Article 6(1) of the GDPR and Article 5(1).

How it connects

References

Related across sources

Enforcement HDPA (Greece) examines deletion request from National Registry of Undesirable Aliens HDPA (Greece) Guidance Guidelines 10/2020 on restrictions under Article 23 GDPR EDPB Guidance Recommendations 01/2021 on the adequacy referential under the Law Enforcement Directive EDPB Case Law GC - T-318/24 Gereral Court Literature HOW GDPR TREATS AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING Journal Scientific and Applied Research Case Law Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(h) – Automated decision-making, including profiling – Scoring – Assessment of the creditworthiness of a natural person – Access to meaningful information about the logic involved in profiling – Verification of the accuracy of the infor Court of Justice of the European Union

Full text

Permanent link. The responsible party did not respond adequately, provided unclear information, or referred the individual to third parties. As a result, the individual filed a complaint with the Data Protection Authority. The responsible party did not respond adequately, provided unclear information, or referred the individual to third parties. As a result, the individual filed a complaint with the Data Protection Authority. The Data Protection Authority has made a final decision in which the responsible party is warned for violating Article 6(1) and Article 5(1)(b) and (e) of the GDPR. The Data Protection Authority also found that the responsible party had failed to comply with its obligations under Article 15(1) and (3) of the GDPR, by providing inaccurate information and refusing to provide a copy of the personal data. The Data Protection Authority has made a final decision in which the responsible party is warned for violating Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(b) and Article 5(1)(e) of the GDPR. The Data Protection Authority also found that the responsible party... --- This content has been automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language. --- This content was automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.

Similar Content