Enforcement · Austrian Data Protection Authority (dsb) NL LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Journalist: Er is onvoldoende juridische basis voor de verwerking van gegevens.
80 euro boete - Oostenrijkse Autoriteit voor Gegevensbescherming (dsb).
80 euro boete - Oostenrijkse Autoriteit voor Gegevensbescherming (dsb).
Full text
De Oostenrijkse gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit heeft een journalist een boete van 80 euro opgelegd. De verantwoordelijke partij heeft onnodige persoonlijke gegevens van een betrokkene op sociale media gepubliceerd, waaronder hun adres.
Relevante artikelen van de AVG: Artikel 5 (1) a), c) AVG, Artikel 6 (1) AVG.
Deze inhoud is automatisch vertaald met behulp van machinevertaling. De originele versie is beschikbaar in de brontaal.
How it connects
Related across sources
C-311/18 Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems C-311/18 (Schrems II) Jul 16, 2020 Privacy Shield Processing Agreement International Transfer
C-757/22 Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V In a preliminary ruling requested by the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 80(2) GDPR in the… Fourth Chamber Jul 11, 2024 Personal Data Transparency Fairness & Transparency
C-40/17 Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV C-40/17 (Fashion ID) Jul 29, 2019 Controllers Legitimate Interest Processors
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-175/20 SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests In Case C-175/20, the Court of Justice of the EU interpreted GDPR Articles 5 and 6 in response to a preliminary ruling from the Latvian Regional Administrative Court concerning a… Fifth Chamber Feb 24, 2022 Retention Period Personal Data Legitimate Interest
C-446/21 Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited In a preliminary ruling arising from proceedings between Maximilian Schrems and Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted GDPR… Fourth Chamber Oct 4, 2024 Retention Period Personal Data Marketing