News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Political Microtargeting by EU Commission illegal

Marketing Encryption Social Media Advertising Practices and Requirements under DSA Monitoring Political Opinions Targeted Advertising and Personalization under DSA Personal Data
Dec 13, 2024 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Guidance EDPB Annual Report 2022 EDPB Literature GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation on Sites Requiring Accessibility Innovative STEM Education Guidance Statement 1/2025 on Age Assurance EDPB Case Law Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Online social networks – General terms of use relating to contracts concluded between a digital platform and a user – Personalised advertising – Article 5(1)(b) – Principle of purpos Court of Justice of the European Union Guidance Guidelines 04/2022 on the calculation of administrative fines under the GDPR EDPB Guidance Guidelines 01/2022 on data subject rights - Right of access EDPB

Full text

Political Microtargeting, Manipulation & Tracking noyb win against the European Commission: The EDPS (European Data Protection Supervisor) has issued a decision finding that the European Commission has illegally targeted advertising at citizens using "sensitive" personal data on their political views. Decision by the EDPSComplaint filed with the EDPS in 2023Related noyb complaints in Germany ("Target Leaks")EU Commission tried to influence political views in the Netherlands. In the contentious fight over the heavily criticised chat control regulation (a proposed EU law that could undermine all encrypted online communication to allow authorities to read online chats), the European Commission has identified the Netherlands as a Member State that they wanted to politically influence. In an attempt to "flip" the views in the Netherlands, the Commission went to X/Twitter and made posts indirectly promoting this regulation.Political Targeting on X/Twitter. However, the European Commission di

Original document at the source noyb.eu

Similar Content