News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

First decision on noyb’s streaming complaints

Right of Access Supervisory Authorities Consent
Sep 16, 2020 Source noyb.eu

Full text

Forced Consent & Consent Bypass First decision on noyb’s streaming complaints - after more than one and a half years In cooperation with the Austrian Chamber of Labour, noyb filed eight complaints against streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon Prime in January 2019 for not sufficiently complying with the right of access under Article 15 GDPR. A first decision has now been issued: At the beginning of September 2020 – more than one and a half years after the complaint was lodged – the Austrian data protection authority (Datenschutzbehörde – "DSB") decided on the complaint against the Vienna streaming service Flimmit. The legal deadline for decisions in Austria is six months. The DSB took its decision only after noyb filed a so-called late complaint with the court, giving the DSB three months to take a decision. "We are pleased that one of our complaints has finally been decided. However, the fact that it took more than one and a half years and a complaint to the Austrian Federal A

How it connects

References

Related across sources

C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… CJEU ·Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Supervision
C-154/21 RW v Österreichische Post AG The Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber), in response to a preliminary reference from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court), interpreted Article… CJEU ·First Chamber Jan 12, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Recipient
C-203/22 CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien In Case C-203/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 15(1)(h) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien… CJEU ·First Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
2 A 165/24 OVG Saarlouis - 2 A 165/24 The data subject was an employee, the controller was the employer. On 14 January 2022, the data subject requested access to personal data from the controller under Article 15… May 13, 2025 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-434/16 Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner C-434/16 (Nowak) CJEU Dec 20, 2017 Right of Access Personal Data Right to be Forgotten
T-318/24 GC T-318/24: EPSO access logs and Article 17 access requests under Regulation 2018/1725 An applicant (the data subject) participated in several EU staff selection procedures administered by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), acting as controller, and… General Court Dec 3, 2025 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction
Related documents