News · Electronic Frontier Foundation EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

EFF Testifies to Congress on Protecting Americans’ Rights from Government AI

Monitoring Artificial Intelligence Essential Entities under NIS2
Jun 4, 2026 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Literature Transparency Discourse on Digital Platforms: A Comparative Textual Analysis of Platform Reports and Regulatory Texts in the EU and Türkiye Lectio Socialis Literature Multifocal analysis of narratives and representations of the European AI Act in Spanish digital newspapers Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Literature From the EU AI Act to Audit Practice: A Governance-to-Controls Framework for Quality Management and Evidence Accounting and Auditing Literature REGULATION OF APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AS A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IN THE EU AI ACT AFMN Biomedicine Literature The triple helix: markets, fundamental rights, and security in EU digital law European Law Open Literature The ethics of regulation: Social contract insights on the 2024 European Union Artificial Intelligence Act Ethics & bioethics

Full text

Governments must not adopt emerging and powerful AI technologies without also adopting strong and clear safeguards to protect Constitutional rights, EFF Senior Policy Analyst Dr. Matthew Guariglia testified today to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection. During the hearing on “The AI Security Landscape: How Frontier Models, Agentic AI, and AI Coding Tools Are Reshaping Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Resilience,” he explained that the use of generative AI for the purposes of mass government surveillance would supercharge unconstitutional violations of civil liberties. He also highlighted how government secrecy, in addition to the black box of for-profit proprietary technology, prevents the public and lawmakers from knowing when AI models make mistakes, including errors that seriously impact the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure and the lives of individuals. “AI also has a track record of getting things wrong—from false

Original document at the source www.eff.org

Similar Content