Laws · GDPR ·art-15-par-1-pnt-h EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Full text
the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, referred to in Article 22(1) and (4) and, at least in those cases, meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.
How it connects
Cited by
- Drivers' Request for Personal Data Access and Automated Decision-Making Information from Ola Netherlands BV: Balancing Personal Data Protection with the Needs of Drivers
- Uber Drivers Request Access to Personal Data and Disclosure of Automated Decision-Making: Balancing Privacy with Passenger Safety
- Court of Amsterdam on GDPR request on information about the existence of automated decision-making at Uber
- Guidelines 01/2022 on data subject rights - Right of access
- If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation
All 14
- EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 2/2021 on standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries
- CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien
- OQ v Land Hessen
- BVwG - W254 2253353-1
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 483/2026
- DSB (Austria) - DSB-D124.5337
- Italian DPA sanctions Experian Italia for incomplete Art. 15 GDPR access responses on
- Italian DPA finds Cerved Group failed to disclose creditworthiness scores in Art. 15
- BVwG - W254 2253351-1
Related across sources
C-203/22 CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien In Case C-203/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 15(1)(h) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien… CJEU ·First Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
W256 2227693-1 Austrian FAC: DPA rightly found loyalty program consent for profiling invalid under GDPR On 05.09.2019, the Austrian DPA (DSB) notified the controller of a customer loyalty program that they were initiating an ex officio investigation. The controller responded by… Federal Administrative Court Sep 28, 2023 Marketing Profiling Automated Decision-Making
C-634/21 OQ v Land Hessen In Case C-634/21, the CJEU addressed a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning OQ's challenge against Land Hessen's refusal to order SCHUFA Holding AG… CJEU ·First Chamber Dec 7, 2023 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse) Artikelen: 5(1)(c), 6(1), en 21 AVG Onderwerp : Beginsel van minimale gegevensverwerking Gek genoeg verwijst het HvJ EU zelf niet naar HvJ EU 1 augustus 2022, C‑184/20… HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse). ·CJEU Jan 9, 2025 IP Address Retention Period Identification
W254 2253353-1 On 7 April 2021, the data subject requested access to their data under Article 15 GDPR The controller replied on 12 April 2021 and provided further information on 27 May 2021 after the data subject made a further enquiry. As the controller's privacy policy listed… BVwG - W254 2253353-1 ·Federal Administrative Court Nov 17, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
C-422/24 Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik. A new page has been created with the following information: "" CJEU Jan 7, 2026 Personal Data Fairness & Transparency Controllers