Laws · GDPR ·art-41-par-2 EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Full text
A body as referred to in paragraph 1 may be accredited to monitor compliance with a code of conduct where that body has:
How it connects
Cited by
- Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under Regulation 2016/679
- Guidelines 03/2021 on the application of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR
- Statement 1/2023 on the first review of the functioning of the adequacy decision for Japan
- Opinion 11/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Sweden regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 02/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Latvia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR
All 30
- Opinion 03/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Romania regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 1/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Croatia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 16/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovenia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 15/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Luxembourg regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 14/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Bulgaria regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 37/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Malta regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 24/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovakia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 23/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Czech Republic regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 11/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Norway regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 10/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Hungary regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 31/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Poland regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 19/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Denmark regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 18/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of the Netherlands regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 20/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Greece regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 10/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authorities of Germany regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 11/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Ireland regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 12/2020 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Finland regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 13/2020 on the the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Italy regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 1/2020 on the Spanish data protection supervisory authority draft accreditation requirements for a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 2/2020 on the Belgium data protection supervisory authority draft accreditation requirements for a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 3/2020 on the France data protection supervisory authority draft accreditation requirements for a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Opinion 17/2019 on the UK data protection supervisory authority draft accreditation requirements for a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR
- Lisa Ballmann v European Data Protection Board
- European Parliament v TC
- EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 4/2026 on the Proposal for a Cybersecurity Act 2 and the Proposal on amendments to the NIS 2 Directive