Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
CJEU: Data Retention Directive does not preclude IP subscriber disclosure in copyright
Original title: BONNIER AUDIO ABET AL. V. PERFECT COMMUNICATIONS WEDEN, 19.April.2012 (“BONNIER”)
Judgment
Summary
Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24): Directive 2006/24 deals exclusively with handling and retention of data generated by electronic communication service providers for the purpose of the investigation, detection, and prosecution of serious crime and their communication to competent national authorities. A national provision transposing the EU intellectual property directive which permits an ISP in civil proceedings to be ordered to give a copyright holder information on the subscriber
Full text
summary
Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24): Directive 2006/24 deals exclusively with handling and retention of data generated by electronic communication service providers for the purpose of the investigation, detection, and prosecution of serious crime and their communication to competent national authorities. A national provision transposing the EU intellectual property directive which permits an ISP in civil proceedings to be ordered to give a copyright holder information on the subscriber to whom the ISP provided an IP address allegedly used in an infringement is outside the scope of Directive 2006/24 and therefore not precluded by that Directive (¶¶ 40-41) (IMPORTANT NOTE: This Directive was declared invalid by Digital Rights Ireland)
¶40 excerpt
Thus, Directive 2006/24 deals exclusively with the handling and retention of data generated or processed by the providers of publicly available electronic communications services or public communications networks for the purpose of the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime and their communication to the competent national authorities.
¶41 excerpt
The material scope of Directive 2006/24 thus stated is confirmed by Article 11 thereof which states that, if such data were retained specifically for the purposes of Article 1(1) of the directive, Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 does not apply to those data.
How it connects
References
Related across sources
Guidelines 3/2019 processing of personal data through video devices Guidelines ·EDPB Jan 30, 2020 Personal Data Processing Material scope (GDPR)
Guidelines 01/2022 data subject rights - Right of access Guidelines ·EDPB Apr 17, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Rectification
2025 Joint Guidelines on the Interplay between the Digital Markets Act and the General Data Protection Regulation Executive summary The Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) pursue different purposes and objectives and have different scopes. While the… EDPB Oct 13, 2025 IP Address Data Portability Direct Marketing
Opinion 5/2019 interplay between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, in particular regarding the competence, tasks and powers of data protection authorities Opinion ·EDPB Mar 12, 2019 Telecommunications Material scope (GDPR) Supervision
Guidelines 4/2019 Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 Guidelines on data protection by design and by default Guidelines ·EDPB Oct 20, 2020 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Default Privacy by Design
Opinion 2/2026 EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework ( EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Opinion Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Notification Obligation Data Breaches