Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
RECHNUNGSHOF V. OSTER REICHISCHER RUNDFUNK, 20.5.2003 (“RUNDFUNK”)
Summary
Direct applicability of Directive 95/46: Wherever provisions of a directive appear to be unconditional and sufficiently precise, they may, in the absence of implementing measures adopted within the prescribed period, be relied on against any incompatible national provision, or insofar as they define rights which individuals are able to assert against the State. (¶ 98)
How it connects
Related across sources
News EDPB identifies challenges hindering the full implementation of the right to erasure News Youth contribute their thoughts on AP supervision Guidance Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) News Legacy Switches: A Proposal to Protect Privacy, Security, Competition, and the Environment from the Internet of Things News DMA and GDPR: EDPB and European Commission endorse joint guidelines to clarify common touchpoints Guidance Guidelines 04/2022 on the calculation of administrative fines under the GDPR
Full text
summary
Direct applicability of Directive 95/46: Wherever provisions of a directive appear to be unconditional and sufficiently precise, they may, in the absence of implementing measures adopted within the prescribed period, be relied on against any incompatible national provision, or insofar as they define rights which individuals are able to assert against the State. (¶ 98)
¶98 excerpt
On this point, it should be noted that wherever the provisions of a directive appear, so far as their subject-matter is concerned, to be unconditional and sufficiently precise, they may, in the absence of implementing measures adopted within the prescribed period, be relied on against any national provision which is incompatible with the directive or in so far as they define rights which individuals are able to assert against the State (see, inter alia, Case 8/81 Becker [1982] ECR 53, paragraph 25, and Case C-141/00 Kügler [2002] ECR I-6833, paragraph 51).
Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu