Skip to content
News · Electronic Frontier Foundation EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Privacy's Defenders Podcast: No Privacy Without Encryption

When we communicate online today – from your personal emails and DMs to secure international commerce – we usually do so with encryption.

Full text

When we communicate online today – from your personal emails and DMs to secure international commerce – we usually do so with encryption. Encryption converts readable data into unreadable gibberish to protect our privacy and security. This didn’t just happen organically. Three decades ago, the U.S government treated encryption like a weapon, and it took some unlikely heroes to set it free: a grad student, a junior lawyer, and a fledgling digital rights group who sued the federal government. The ruling in Bernstein v. Department of Justice held that code is speech and so is protected by the First Amendment – a precedent that underpins the internet as we know it today. This landmark case was led by Cindy Cohn, then a young pro bono lawyer working on behalf of EFF, who went on to become EFF’s legal director and then executive director. Welcome to the second episode of “Privacy’s Defenders,” a podcast about the people – lawyers, journalists, hackers, and others – who’ve fought to secure yo

How it connects

C-755/21 Marián Kočner v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) In Case C-755/21 P, Marián Kočner appealed a General Court judgment dismissing his claim for compensation against Europol for alleged damage arising from Europol's disclosure of… CJEU ·Grand Chamber Mar 5, 2024 Supervision Liability Personal Data
C-175/20 SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests In Case C-175/20, the Court of Justice of the EU interpreted GDPR Articles 5 and 6 in response to a preliminary ruling from the Latvian Regional Administrative Court concerning a… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber Feb 24, 2022 Retention Period Personal Data Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-687/21 BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH In Case C-687/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Articles 5, 24, 32, and 82 of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling request from the Amtsgericht… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 25, 2024 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Personal Data
ROT 25/7371 ING Bank N.V. (the controller) is a bank In 2022, several data subjects brought a complaint to the DPA regarding the controller’s contactless payments. The data subjects requested the controller to issue debit cards… ROT 25/7371 ·Rb. Rotterdam Jun 24, 2026 Personal Data Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Controllers
S 5 SF 65/24 DS SG Nürnberg: MOVEit zero-day cyberattack via processor did not breach Art. 32 GDPR The data subject (a child born in 2018), represented by her parents, was insured with the controller (a statutory health insurance provider) and participated in its digital bonus… Social Court Nuremberg Jun 10, 2026 Processors Controllers Integrity and Confidentiality Principle