Skip to content
Case Law · General Court ·T-190/10 EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Kathleen Egan and Margaret Hackett v European Parliament

The General Court (Fifth Chamber) ruled on whether the European Parliament could refuse access to public registers of assistants to former MEPs under the privacy exception in Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001.

Status Cited by 1 decision here who cites it →

Judgment·Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 March 2012·Fifth Chamber

Summary

The Court held that documents once accessible to the public but no longer accessible still fall within the scope of the privacy exception, requiring the institution to examine each document specifically and individually and to provide adequate reasoning for refusal. The Court annulled Parliament's refusal decision because it failed to carry out the required specific and individual examination of the requested documents.

Full text 1 paragraphs

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

Operative part The Court: 1. Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 12 February 2010 in so far as it refuses to grant Kathleen Egan and Margaret Hackett the access requested to the public registers of assistants to former members of the European Parliament; 2. Orders the Parliament to pay the costs incurred by Mrs Egan and Mrs Hackett and to refund to the Court cashier the sums advanced by way of legal aid granted to Mrs Egan; 3. Orders the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) to bear its own costs.

How it connects