Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
SERGEJS BUIVIDS v. THE AUGSTĀKĀ TIESA
Summary
Right to Privacy: In the present case, it “cannot be ruled out that the recording and publication of the video in question, which took place without the persons concerned being informed of the recording and its purposes, constitutes an interference with the fundamental right to privacy of those persons, namely the police officers featured in that video.” (¶67) The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamen
How it connects
References
Related across sources
Enforcement UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.34.2023 Guidance EDPB Annual Report 2025 Guidance EDPB Work Programme 2026-2027 Enforcement MediaLab.AI, Inc.: Insufficient legal basis for data processing Literature If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation News Fighting for algorithmic justice: lessons learned in working closely with affected people
Full text
summary
Right to Privacy: In the present case, it “cannot be ruled out that the recording and publication of the video in question, which took place without the persons concerned being informed of the recording and its purposes, constitutes an interference with the fundamental right to privacy of those persons, namely the police officers featured in that video.” (¶67) The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms would be relevant to determine the balance between the right to privacy and the right to freedom of expression.
¶67 excerpt
In the present case, it is apparent from the documents submitted to the Court that it cannot be ruled out that the recording and publication of the video in question, which took place without the persons concerned being informed of the recording and its purposes, constitutes an interference with the fundamental right to privacy of those persons, namely the police officers featured in that video.
Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu