AI Act Recital 135 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 135 — Union level codes for AI content labelling

Transparency AI Act Requirements AI Provider Transparency
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

Without prejudice to the mandatory nature and full applicability of the transparency obligations, the Commission may also encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of practice at Union level to facilitate the effective implementation of the obligations regarding the detection and labelling of artificially generated or manipulated content, including to support practical arrangements for making, as appropriate, the detection mechanisms accessible and facilitating cooperation with other actors along the value chain, disseminating content or checking its authenticity and provenance to enable the public to effectively distinguish AI-generated content.

Related across sources

News AI transparency requirements apply from August 2: AP advises signing code of practice Literature The Magician’s Eye Guidance Report on stakeholder event on processing of personal data to target or deliver political advertisements Literature Italy’s Artificial Intelligence Act and Global AI Governance: The EU Model’s Practice and Prospects News AI Omnibus: Reject the proposals to undermine transparency in the AI Act Literature A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act: Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance