AI Act Recital 137 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 137 — transparency compliance not implying lawfulness

Transparency AI Act Requirements AI Value Chain Actors and Roles Artificial Intelligence AI Provider Transparency AI Transparency
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

Compliance with the transparency obligations for the AI systems covered by this Regulation should not be interpreted as indicating that the use of the AI system or its output is lawful under this Regulation or other Union and Member State law and should be without prejudice to other transparency obligations for deployers of AI systems laid down in Union or national law.

Related across sources

News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems? News AI transparency requirements apply from August 2: AP advises signing code of practice Literature The Magician’s Eye Guidance Report on stakeholder event on processing of personal data to target or deliver political advertisements Literature Italy’s Artificial Intelligence Act and Global AI Governance: The EU Model’s Practice and Prospects News AI Omnibus: Reject the proposals to undermine transparency in the AI Act