As regards high-risk AI systems that are safety components of products or systems, or which are themselves products or systems falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council(24), Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(25), Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(26), Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(27), Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council(28), Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council(29), Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council(30), and Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council(31), it is appropriate to amend those acts to ensure that the Commission takes into account, on the basis of the technical and regulatory specificities of each sector, and without interfering with existing governance, conformity assessment and enforcement mechanisms and authorities established therein, the mandatory requirements for high-risk AI systems laid down in this Regulation when adopting any relevant delegated or implementing acts on the basis of those acts.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 49
Related across sources
News A call to EU legislators: protect rights and reject the call to delete transparency safeguard in AI Act Guidance Version history News The AI Act isn’t enough: closing the dangerous loopholes that enable rights violations Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement Guidance ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems?